The inverse square law, as I've said I'm sure you know, is what dictates a dynamic microphone is going to be better when external noise is either a problem, or an unknown factor purely because of the distance at which you use the microphone.
#HOW GOOD IS SAMSON SOUND DECK SOFTWARE HOW TO#
That's the reason we get endless posts asking how to fix mouth sounds, because they don't have the experience to avoid them in the first place. But I'm sure as hell not going to recommend people who have no experience with mics talk up close to a condenser. Now, a condenser used within the range you would typically use a dynamic? Sure, in terms of room acoustics and background noise, it's going to be just as good. We don't know the acoustics of everybody asking for advice, and so we recommend for a common worst case scenario - a boxy basement, filled with hard surfaces. Okay, I'm sure you know all of this, but it's not coming across in the message here, so I'll say it for the benefit of others reading - the reason I, and many other people peddle dynamic mics over condensers, especially for people who don't know what they're doing, is because they're harder to get wrong.Ī condenser at a reasonable distance to avoid proximity effect as you would typically have it in a treated studio is going to pick up room noise and ambience like hell, and sound terrible in a room with bad acoustics. I don't agree in the slightest that it's better than a condenser for up close voice. I'm just at a bit of a lose as how to choose. And if I order a model from Amazon and don't like it, I'm going to have to pay for return shipping, so I'm wasting money no matter what in that scenario. But I also know from my logitech experience that more expensive does not always mean better.
#HOW GOOD IS SAMSON SOUND DECK SOFTWARE UPGRADE#
But I would rather have a quality microphone and not need to upgrade again later. I don't have a ton of background, so I think I could get away with a condenser. Then there's this gooseneck microphone that has surprisingly stunning reviews (though only 11), and one reviewer who says they specifically use it for Youtube. Others start climbing in price to the point that I might as well go with the above.Īs far as condensers, this microphone seems to be really popular, has great reviews, and costs $22. I've found a few dynamic usb mics on amazon under $30, but the reviews on them say they record really quiet or have a hum or other interference. The microphone itself + usb cord to plug into the computer + desktop stand + wind screen will cost $42.50. This microphone was recommended a while back, and it has good reviews. I've been told a dynamic mic is better than a condenser. But if you want some info on what I'm looking at, read on. If you want to stop reading right here, you can. I've realized they hurt my ears, and that's just not viable for recording sessions for me. I'd rather not throw away another $60, but I still want to upgrade my mic.ĭo you use a USB mic? Do you like it? How is the quality? Please don't recommend a headset. Even though it shows a significant difference in reducing background noise, I don't use it. My other issue is has nothing as far as eliminating background noise.Ī while back, I purchased a $60 logitech headset and my voice sounds terrible on it. I have to boost it in audio editing, and even then I'd like to be able to boost it more but can't because then the quality starts to degrade. The problems I have with it is it doesn't record my voice very loud. It actually sounds really great quality wise, which I know is very unusual. Right now, I'm using the built-in microphone on my computer. I want to upgrade to a better quality microphone.
0 kommentar(er)
